Perlindungan Hukum Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian Elektronik Menurut Hukum Perdata Indonesia

Authors

  • Hardito Nawaskoro Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Author
  • Luthfiyyah Amalina Husna Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65244/jggls.v2i1.170

Keywords:

Civil Law, Electronic Agreement, Civil Code

Abstract

Advances in information and communication technology have spurred substantial changes in legal transaction procedures in Indonesia, primarily through the utilization of electronic agreements. Agreements that were previously made in traditional paper formats are now frequently conducted digitally, raising legal concerns regarding their legality, validity, evidence, and legal protection for the involved parties, particularly consumers. Although electronic agreements are normatively recognized in the Civil Code (KUHP) and the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions, practical implementation issues persist, leading to legal uncertainty. This research employs a normative legal methodology utilizing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data was obtained through a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources related to electronic agreements and civil legal protection. Qualitative descriptive analysis was conducted to investigate the legal status of electronic agreements and the legal protection available for the parties within the Indonesian legal framework. The discussion results indicate that electronic agreements possess legal validity and binding force equivalent to traditional agreements, provided they meet the criteria for a valid agreement as outlined in Article 1320 of the Civil Code and the provisions of the Information Technology Law. Legal protection in electronic agreements encompasses legal certainty, the recognition of electronic document and signature evidence, and consumer protection against detrimental standard clauses. Nevertheless, challenges remain in establishing party identification, ensuring the integrity of digital contracts, and addressing power imbalances between commercial entities and consumers. This study concludes that while electronic agreements are legally recognized under Indonesian civil law, enhancing legal protection requires strengthened regulations, consistent law enforcement, and improved legal and digital literacy among the public to ensure secure, fair, and equitable electronic transactions.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amajihono, Kosmas Dohu. “KEKUATAN HUKUM KONTRAK ELEKTRONIK.” Jurnal Panah Keadilan 1, no. 2 (2022).

Arrodli, Ahmad Jalaludin, Andika Ramadhan, Anggita, Denis Zakia Muhammad, Depi Dwi Pamungkas, and Dikha Anugrah. “Konsekuensi Hukum Cacat Kehendak Dalam Pembentukan Perjanjian Sesuai Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata.” Letterlijk: Jurnal Hukum Perdata 1, no. 2 (2024).

Aulia, Keysha Nashwa, Ayu Lestari, Lika Mulki Latief, and Noerma Kurnia Fajarwati. “Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan Hukum Dalam Pandangan Ilmu Komunikasi.” Jurnal Sains Student Research 2, no. 1 (2024).

Aulia, Sisca. “Pola Perilaku Konsumen Digital Dalam Memanfaatkan Aplikasi Dompet Digital.” Jurnal Komunikasi 12, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24912/jk.v12i2.9829.

Ayu Artanti, Dyah, and Men Wih Widiatno. “KEABSAHAN KONTRAK ELEKTRONIK DALAM PASAL 18 AYAT 1 UU I.T.E DITINJAU DARI HUKUM PERDATA DI INDONESIA.” JCA of LAW 1, no. 1 (2020).

Desi Syamsiah. “KAJIAN TERKAIT KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN E-COMMERCE BILA DITINJAU DARI PASAL 1320 KUHPerdata TENTANG SYARAT SAH PERJANJIAN.” Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian 2, no. 1 (2021).

Ekawati, Hana Novita, and Johan. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM PELAKSANAAN KONTRAK ELEKTRONIK DITINJAU DARI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN.” JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani 3, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.46601/juridica.v3i1.194.

Hernida, Dina, Salsabila Nurul Utami, Atika Purnamasari, Indah Ade Puspita, and M Noval Akbar. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online (E-Commerce)” 1 (2023): 121–28.

Mahara Saputri, Dea. “Kepastian Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Atas Perjanjian Elektronik Pada E-Commerce.” Pamulang Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v5i2.25521.

Mokosolang, Arlan Ariya. “Kekuatan Hukum Surat Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Perkara Perdata (Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik).” Lex Administratum Vol.XI/No.04/Jun/2023 Mempunyai 3, no. 04 (2023).

Muhidin, M. “Strategi Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce: Perlunya Reformasi Regulasi Dan Edukasi Publik.” PAMARENDA: Public Administration and … 5, no. 1 (2025).

Mutia Dwi Wibowo, Yudhi Widyo Armono, and Ashinta Sekar Bidari. “Kendala Penerapan Penerapan Syarat Sahnya Perjanjian Menurut Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata : Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online Via Tokopedia Di Akademi Bisnis Digital Surakarta.” Justicia Journal 11, no. 1 (2022).

Permono, Yudhi Tri. “Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Secara Online” 35, no. 1 (2019): 77–100.

Sari Puspita Ikka. “Keabsahan Perjanjian Kontrak Elektronik Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Di Tinjau Dari Prespektif Hukum Perdata.” AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2022).

Septiari, Ni Luh Gede Mella, and Ni Made Puspautari Ujianti. “Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Elektronik Dalam Perspektif KUH Perdata Dan UU ITE.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice 2, no. 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i4.4320.

Sibarani, Tobias William Reuven, and Gunardi Lie. “Pemahaman Perlindungan Preventif Berdasarkan Undang – Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999.” Multilingual: Journal of Universal Studies 4, no. 2 (2024).

Soekarto, Soerjono. “Pengantar Penelitian Ilmu Hukum.” Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies 2, no. 2 (2019).

Wardani, Ikhlasul Sholah Kusuma, Alya Safirah, and Alfika Salsa Qurrotulaini. “Kontrak Elektronik Dalam Mekanisme Hukum Di Indonesia.” Unes Law Review 6, no. 3 (2024).

Published

2025-12-23

How to Cite

Perlindungan Hukum Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian Elektronik Menurut Hukum Perdata Indonesia. (2025). Journal of Golden Generation Legal Science, 2(1), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.65244/jggls.v2i1.170